Dear Mr. President:
Having had their moments of shock, anger and venting on message boards and blogs, soccer fans who are certain the new North American Soccer League is the way forward are now taking their message directly to the head man at US Soccer, Sunil Gulati. In response to USSF’s revoking of sanctioning for the NASL for the 2011 season, they’ve sent Gulati a letter, which you can read in its entirety here or with my snarky comments after the jump.
Dear President Gulati,
As supporters of North American Soccer League (NASL) clubs, we would like to voice our concern regarding the recent decision by your Federation to rescind the provisional Division 2 status of the NASL. We are personally appalled by the decision of the Federation to deny second division sanctioning to the NASL. Many fans were positively encouraged by the interest the USSF paid to second division soccer this season, and were pleased by the new standards put in place to ensure stability and continuity at the second division level. We thank the USSF for the interest and leadership you have provided during 2010 to stabilize and maintain second division.
First sentence was strong, but then it went a bit off the rails. “Personally appalled” is only the first instance of overreacting and making this about themselves rather than the game. This paragraph finished strongly, though. This letter had a chance after the first graf.
Should our community be deprived of high level, but affordable entertainment in the form of NASL soccer for 2011, fans will be starved of access to the beautiful game.
Let’s see…Edmonton hasn’t had D2 soccer for more than a series of exhibitions since 2004. Atlanta’s D2 team last played in 2008. If there’s one team in all of this that doesn’t really need a league this year, it’s Montreal – they could play exhibitions against AC Milan or Manchester United or whoever else wants to make a US tour this summer, plus Rochester, and be just fine before heading to MLS in 2012. How is their starvation going to be any different than in the last several years, exactly? How are the handfuls of people who attended matches at Lockhart Stadium going to find their lives different if Miami FC doesn’t play this year, exactly?
And if there’s one thing you can’t say about the American soccer fan, it’s that he or she is ever “starved of access to the beautiful game.” We’ve got more access to soccer – at high levels – than ever before in this country. But not getting to see Division II-level soccer – for one year, probably – is going to kill you?
Without professional soccer in our community, many fans may simply move on to other sports and an opportunity to continue the upward trajectory of interest in soccer here at home will be lost.
Serious question: how many soccer fans do you know who move on to other sports? And, again, let’s go back to Atlanta and Edmonton, who haven’t had teams in years. Did their fans “simply move on to other sports?” Many soccer fans are already fans of other sports in addition to soccer (unless they’re doing the I’m-too-cool-for-American-football routine). And our country went 12 years without a major league – yet soccer is more popular than ever on these shores.
For our youth soccer community, it is imperative that the NASL play at the second division level this season.
Won’t someone please think of the kids?
What? “Imperative?” Can you imagine the percentage of youth soccer players in this country that don’t live anywhere near one of the 21 professional soccer teams in the continental US? Wasn’t it imperative that we have a Division I league in the 90′s? How’d we come through that, okay? Kids playing soccer, they still played soccer, right? Some of them even became professional players, oddly enough.
The USSF is striving to improve soccer in the United States and improve our national team. But if we deny young fans in five key American soccer markets local heroes to emulate and a club to support, we potentially lose a generation of kids who can help make the United States the best we can be in World Soccer.
Like all the ones we lost between 1985 and 1996, right?
Look, we all know the stories of Tab Ramos and John Harkes growing up aspiring to be New York Cosmos, but Landon Donovan didn’t have time to emulate his local heroes because he was too busy freaking playing soccer. Which is what “kids who can help make the United States the best we can be in World Soccer” are going to be doing, not trying to get Caleb Norkus’ autograph.
The partner federations and communities in Canada and Puerto Rico would also be severely affected.
Well, I’m not really concerned about Canada and Puerto Rico, sorry. The Canadians have had years and years to get their house in order. If they have to continue to do that without FC Edmonton, so be it. Canada’s a big country – I think they’ll survive.
The loss of our league will also have an inevitable ripple effect that will hurt not only the US National Team program and supporter’s base, but also development of soccer throughout the CONCACAF region.
Wow. That’s big. “Inevitable,” you say? How is the National Team program going to be hurt by the loss of a league in which no national team-level players actually play, again? And I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but the “supporter’s base” for the national team is quite a bit larger than that of the fan base in individual communities and they’re not as interconnected as you seem to think.
The NASL serves as a competitive league where many nations throughout the region have players developing their talent.
It should be noted at this point that the NASL, as an independent league, hasn’t exactly played an actual game yet.
Having better players throughout our region will no doubt be beneficial to the development of US Soccer, providing stronger competition to challenge and grow the US Nation Team.
Or the National team, even. So…when was the last time you saw the US National Team play against a team in World Cup qualifying that had a reasonable number of players who ply their trade in the American second division?
When our teams played in USL, we were never able to keep track of our opponents or the composition of the league.
Good luck if you’re looking for AC St. Louis this year, then. And potentially Carolina.
But let’s look at the “never able to keep track” argument for a second. Tampa Bay never played in USL, so they’re out. Edmonton never played in USL, so they’re out. Montreal and Minnesota had both been around long enough to see more makeup changes than a Miss America contestant, but that’s our country. Carolina’s been in the league since 2007. From the time Miami entered the USL First Division in 2006 to 2009, there were 12, 12, 11 and 11 teams in the league. Exactly 16 teams total played in those seasons – half of them played all four and three more played in three. Austin, California, Cleveland, Toronto and Virginia Beach were all one-hit wonders, but, God, that’s too many changes to keep track of.
It’s also worth nothing that many of these people are the promotion and relegation zealots who would have every league’s roster of teams change a bit every year. But not too much! Can’t keep track!
The NASL has been forthright and aggressive in its local marketing while pledging a needed stability at the second division level.
Show me some example of this “aggressive local marketing,” if you would, please. And the key word in the second sentence is “pledging.” We all know the second division level needs stability – you won’t get any argument on that from anyone who’s been following this whole saga. But there’s a big difference between pledging it and delivering it.
The NASL’s ability to attract the type of investors the USSF wants involved in the sport based on the new second division standards also has local fans excited about the future of both our teams and the league we compete in. We feel ownership and a connection to our league, the NASL that we never felt for USL.
Again, the NASL has been in operation since November of 2009. That’s not quite 15 months. That thing you’re feeling? That’s endorphins. The NASL is the new hot chick, that’s why you’re feeling that.
The teams of the NASL have already invested much time and resources to establish this second division league.
And some of them actually haven’t been taken over by Traffic! Yet!
This is the foundation for creating a stable second division in this country, as opposed to a league that benefits from the constant expansion and contraction of teams.
If you think the NASL has actually hit on a formula to stop the constant expansion and contraction of teams at the second division level, I’d have to call you optimistic at best and delusional at worst. Where, exactly, is the proof of this? That they’re going to be different from USL? That they won’t be subject to the same market conditions, twists and turns? Because you say they won’t?
We believe that it is time for the USSF to work for what is best for the future and stability of U.S. Soccer. The mission should be to further the game’s roots in our communities by supporting soccer at all levels.
No argument there. I think the debate is about how best to go about that.
We hope you recognize the vital role second division soccer plays across North American and Puerto Rico. We ask that you reverse this shortsighted and damaging decision.
That’s the way, get mean when you want someone to give you something.
Displacing fans and hurting the development of soccer in the United States should not be what the USSF is all about. Your role as a governing body is to promote the sport and grow the game. Working with the NASL to establish a long needed, stable second division is the type of positive development this sport sorely needs.
I’m all in favor of working with whomever wants to help soccer in this country. But don’t you think US Soccer would be justified in saying, “Okay, meet us halfway on this – hire your second employee? We told you back last August what you’d have to do to have a league and you haven’t done it.”
“But you didn’t make MLS adhere to standards back in 1996,” many of them say. So that means we can’t have standards now? The situation’s not messed-up enough that someone shouldn’t step in and try to restore some order?
Look, I’m totally with you that USL was a mess. I used to work in the league, I have friends there, but from the late 1990s on, they made a ton of mistakes that helped bring us to the point we’ve reached today. From letting used car salesmen own teams (the alternative? no team – isn’t that part of your platform here?) to continuing to do business the way they’d always done it despite a changing game and changing expectations, USL made almost every mistake you can make.
As a result, they angered a group of owners who broke away and formed their own league (even though – ironically enough – one of the leaders of that charge, Selby Wellman in Carolina, cashed in his chips recently). If that forced USL to re-examine itself (it was taken over by new owners about the same time), that’s a good thing, yes?
Since the split and sale to NuRock, USL has hired a director of communications, director of creative services, senior director of PDL, national technical director, media relations manager, communications coordinator, director of interactive production, technical advisor, operations manager, player registrar, director of corporate sponsorships and senior director of youth leagues. The NASL has hired a blogger.
USL has decided it’s out of the second division business for now – and that’s a good thing. Sometimes you have to tear the whole thing down and build from the ground up, like American soccer did after the demise of the original NASL. Their third-division league – USL PRO – has a core group of long-standing teams and some expansion teams that, quite frankly, aren’t likely to see 2013. But that’s American soccer. And I can guarantee you that this NASL hasn’t hit on the magic elixir that’s going to keep that from happening.
I’ve said all along the most reasonable thing for USSF to do would have been to grant the NASL provisional sanctioning for 2011 with a clear set of expectations and goals to achieve full sanctioning in 2012 (there is precedent for this – USSF gave the USISL’s Select League provisional Division II status in 1996 with an eye towards full status in 1997, but the merger with the APSL made that a moot point). If six months isn’t enough time to reach the requirements set out for the second division – requirements that, let us not forget, the owners of the teams you support claimed to be on board with and welcomed, then fine. You have until 2012 to prove to us all that you can actually pull this off.
If the NASL gets its house in order and proves it can administer a viable second-division league in 2012, I’m all in favor of it. American soccer absolutely needs strength, viability and stability at all levels of the game.
But I have yet to see anything that makes me think they can do it.
Tags: dumb soccer fans, MLS, NASL, soccer, USL
February 1st, 2011 at 4:43 pm
“Your role as a governing body is to promote the sport and grow the game.”
Unfortunately, these guys don’t realize that you can promote the sport and grow the game simply by weeding out the hucksters who want to pillage the sport for their own good. MLS never gets enough credit for sniffing out Cooper and the taxi medallion guy who wanted to open a team in San Antonio.
February 1st, 2011 at 4:46 pm
And do you think USSF has similar concerns about Traffic?
February 1st, 2011 at 5:11 pm
this is starting to sound like a Bernie Slaven post.
February 1st, 2011 at 8:15 pm
Keep on drinking the USL kool aid.
February 1st, 2011 at 8:37 pm
Do you know that year after year USL has started a season with teams and some of those teams didn’t exist next season…
February 1st, 2011 at 8:39 pm
Like AC St. Louis, right?
February 1st, 2011 at 10:22 pm
One doesn’t have to be pro-USL or anti-NASL to think that USSF is doing the right thing here, WSW.
Have to say I’m amused at the outrage. USSF set standards. USL determined they couldn’t meet those standards and went for the less-sanctioned and less-prestigious* D3. NASL clearly doesn’t meet the D2 standards. Why should they be approved?
*-although the Charleston Battery fans didn’t seem to care
February 1st, 2011 at 11:23 pm
Thanks for calling out the bullshit, Kenn.
February 2nd, 2011 at 7:04 am
Right on target, as always. I’ve lived through some of those USL years in Columbus and Indiana, so I know what you mean from personal experience. But it was a fun ride in many ways.
February 2nd, 2011 at 8:11 am
Do you know, WSW, how many minor league hockey teams there were in 2000? 111. Do you know how many there are now? 80. Do you know when the last time was that the same number of minor league hockey teams started consecutive seasons? 1993-94.
Is the USL running hockey, too?
Is the USL running indoor soccer, too?
Do you know how many WNBA teams there were in 2000? 16. Do you know how many there are today? 12. Is the USL running the WNBA as well?
This is the nature of the beast in this country. I’m sorry if fanboys in Miami can’t possibly keep track of the comings and goings in their league, but, please, just stop. Stop it.
I GUARANTEE you that the NASL hasn’t hit on the magic formula that’s going to keep franchises from folding. Only myopic fanboys like yourself believe that.
February 2nd, 2011 at 8:57 am
Obviously the biggest mistake was not giving D2 a direct spot in the CONCACAF Champions League. If that had been done, soccer would have BILLIONS of fans by now!!!!
February 2nd, 2011 at 9:02 am
Well examined, thought-out and cross-sectioned article. Well spoken expose on a load of NASL bull!
My personal opinion is that the breakaway owners who left USL (in a huff) and formed this abomination to the NASL name are responsible for throwing organized semi-professional (let’s call it what it is) soccer in this country (and Canada), into a tailspin!
Jeff Cooper (A.C. St. Louis) was a dreamer who, as far as I can see, never really had a viable plan for a USL or NASL franchise, let alone an MLS franchise, and Joey Saputo knew that he’d be blowing town for the MLS anyway. Carolina’s going to be broke, and “Traffic” sports group USA owns most of the rest of the franchises in NASL!
How, please explain, how is this good for fans or good for the game? The mutineers got what was coming to them! Whine, whine, whine. USL didn’t do everything perfectly… what a shock! What league does? Some good pointers by “admin” on other sports organizations and their turnover rate!
Here’s one: NFL – Baltimore Colts leave town; move to Indianapolis. NFL leadership allow Cleveland Browns to leave Cleveland to replace the Colts. Cleveland Browns are now called Baltimore Ravens. Cleveland, angry at losing their team petitions NFL for a replacement, and get one! Who? The Cleveland Browns!
Los Angeles had two NFL franchises (Raiders and Rams). Raiders returned to Oakland and Rams moved to St. Louis. L.A. – one of the largest markets in the country has no NFL team!
Houston’s team (Oilers) left for Tennessee (and became the Titans). NFL football’s viability in Houston was so poor and far-fetched, that the NFL gave them another one (Texans) and the people of Texas built them a new stadium!
Sound crazy, or hard to keep track of? The NFL is considered the best-run, most profitable sports organization in the WORLD! USL’s woes are NO different than anyone elses and they were doing an adequate job of selling a sport that not a lot of Americans are convinced they’re interested in yet!
I scoff at the current NASL and wish nothing more for their teams than to join the USL and show their mediocrity!
February 2nd, 2011 at 9:10 am
And Dan weighs in:
http://www.bigsoccer.com/forum/blog.php?b=10886
Dan said to me, “(The NASL) richly deserve(s) scorn and mockery, but the poor schlub in Tampa or Blaine doesn’t.”
To which I replied, “The poor schlub in Tampa or Blaine does if he writes a letter like that with more exaggerations than a fisherman’s convention.”
I’m still waiting for the first person with an established history of being reasonable and intelligent to speak up in favor of the NASL.
I’m also waiting to see examples of this “aggressive local marketing.”
February 2nd, 2011 at 9:13 am
moderate comments much?
February 2nd, 2011 at 9:16 am
Get over yourself much?
It’s called akismet, genius, and it means people who haven’t commented before aren’t automatically approved.
February 2nd, 2011 at 9:18 am
Cary News weighs in:
http://www.carynews.com/2011/01/26/26836/nows-time-to-be-open.html
These are the people with whom you’ve cast your lot. Yet you won’t come off your position.
February 2nd, 2011 at 9:49 am
Admin:
Good link (Cary News Article). Pretty much articulates everything that I’ve felt about the formation of the “new NASL” ever since the idea was concieved! Good blog you have here. Quality stuff!
February 2nd, 2011 at 12:29 pm
[...] undaunted, releasing a letter to U.S. Soccer complaining about the lack of D2 status. Kenn Tomasch calmly shredded the letter, mostly by reminding NASL fans that you have to play a few seasons, or at least a few [...]
February 3rd, 2011 at 9:42 am
The NASL’s thinking, or at least the thinking of these letter-writers, seems to include the assumption that if the USSF is not working to advance the NASL’s interests, it therefore is not working “for what is best for the future and stablility of U.S. Soccer.” Hell of an assumption.
February 3rd, 2011 at 3:08 pm
“the taxi medallion guy” Andrew Murnstein (sp) just recently bought into a NASCAR team- the same team that former Liverpool owner George Gillette bailed out of.
The name on the front says Richard Petty Motorsports, but it’s the taxi medallion money that’s running it.
February 3rd, 2011 at 3:09 pm
Did he bring in Wheelock to change tires?