Taking Attendance: Final Unofficial PDL Attendance Numbers
With the USL’s PDL regular season just completed and the playoffs underway, here’s a look at the final (unofficial) numbers for the league (as always, additions and corrections are welcome):
| Rk | Team | G | Total | Average | Median | High | Low |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Des Moines Menace | 8 | 27,790 | 3,474 | 3,497 | 3,961 | 2,929 |
| 2 | Fresno Fuego | #5 | 15,237 | 3,047 | 2,743 | 4,361 | 1,723 |
| 3 | Portland Timbers | 8 | 23,079 | 2,885 | 1,444 | 8,174 | 349 |
| 4 | Carolina Dynamo | 8 | 13,620 | 1,703 | 1,710 | 2,741 | 945 |
| 5 | Austin Aztex | 8 | 11,157 | 1,395 | 1,235 | 2,507 | 808 |
| 6 | Ventura Co.Fusion | 8 | 10,417 | 1,302 | 1,023 | 3,165 | 749 |
| 7 | West Texas Sockers | 8 | 10,202 | 1,275 | 1,182 | 1,917 | 972 |
| 8 | Victoria Highlanders | *7 | 7,116 | 1,017 | 1,078 | 1,253 | 720 |
| 9 | W. Mass Pioneers | **6 | 5,376 | 896 | 881 | 1,491 | 411 |
| 10 | BYU Cougars | *7 | 6,151 | 879 | 944 | 2,026 | 207 |
| 11 | Laredo Heat | 8 | 5,747 | 718 | 682 | 1,123 | 526 |
| 12 | Tucson | *7 | 4,769 | 681 | 686 | 827 | 513 |
| 13 | Ocean City | *7 | 4,384 | 626 | 481 | 1,175 | 298 |
| 14 | Michigan Bucks | *7 | 4,050 | 579 | 419 | 1,342 | 285 |
| 15 | Palmetto Bantams | 8 | 4,324 | 541 | 509 | 1,031 | 216 |
| 16 | Thunder Bay Chill | 8 | 4,311 | 539 | 536 | 583 | 509 |
| 17 | Forest City London | *7 | 3,550 | 507 | 400 | 1,000 | 200 |
| 18 | Mississippi Brilla | 8 | 4,014 | 502 | 550 | 667 | 223 |
| 19 | New Orleans Jesters | &2 | 1,000 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 |
| 20 | Panama City | #5 | 2,420 | 484 | 455 | 598 | 407 |
| 21 | WSA Winnipeg | 8 | 3,750 | 469 | 375 | 1,200 | 250 |
| 22 | Vermont Voltage | *7 | 3,176 | 454 | 241 | 1,340 | 135 |
| 23 | El Paso Patriots | 8 | 3,551 | 444 | 476 | 816 | 180 |
| 24 | Kitsap Pumas | *7 | 3,069 | 438 | 438 | 691 | 228 |
| 25 | Sounders U23 | **6 | 2,523 | 421 | 282 | 968 | 68 |
| 26 | Baltimore Bohemians | 8 | 3,198 | 400 | 349 | 753 | 131 |
| 27 | LI Rough Riders | 8 | 2,913 | 364 | 330 | 612 | 103 |
| 28 | CFC Azul | 8 | 2,853 | 357 | 365 | 457 | 235 |
| 29 | Kansas City Brass | *7 | 2,379 | 340 | 358 | 398 | 213 |
| 30 | Va. Beach Piranhas | 8 | 2,691 | 336 | 304 | 558 | 258 |
| 31 | Fredericksburg | 8 | 2,660 | 333 | 271 | 537 | 202 |
| 32 | Worcester Hydra | 8 | 2,589 | 324 | 300 | 531 | 250 |
| 33 | Reading United AC | 8 | 2,389 | 299 | 292 | 416 | 220 |
| 34 | Orlando City U23 | %4 | 1,183 | 296 | 308 | 468 | 100 |
| 35 | Ocala Stampede | 8 | 2,325 | 291 | 275 | 500 | 150 |
| 36 | GPS Portland Phoenix | 8 | 2,176 | 272 | 274 | 500 | 125 |
| 37 | Real Colorado Foxes | *7 | 1,875 | 268 | 200 | 450 | 150 |
| 38 | St. Louis Lions | 8 | 2,088 | 261 | 277 | 423 | 100 |
| 39 | Jersey Express | 8 | 1,863 | 233 | 205 | 526 | 100 |
| 40 | No. Virginia Royals | 8 | 1,856 | 232 | 230 | 375 | 68 |
| 41 | So. Calif. Seahorses | 8 | 1,783 | 223 | 200 | 356 | 145 |
| 42 | FtL Schulz Academy | *6 | 1,236 | 206 | 231 | 300 | 100 |
| 43 | Seacoast United | 8 | 1,585 | 198 | 100 | 610 | 100 |
| 44 | Cincinnati Kings | 8 | 1,508 | 189 | 144 | 501 | 55 |
| 45 | Ottawa Fury | 8 | 1,505 | 188 | 175 | 305 | 100 |
| 46 | Cen. Jersey Spartans | %4 | 749 | 187 | 90 | 504 | 65 |
| 47 | SWV King’s Warriors | 8 | 1,485 | 186 | 193 | 305 | 95 |
| 48 | Ogden Outlaws | 8 | 1,452 | 182 | 189 | 253 | 109 |
| 49 | Jax Destroyers | 8 | 1,449 | 181 | 187 | 325 | 70 |
| 50 | Boston Victory | 8 | 1,365 | 171 | 118 | 546 | 52 |
| 51 | VSI Tampa Flames | 8 | 1,342 | 168 | 140 | 365 | 105 |
| 52 | River City Rovers | 8 | 1,303 | 163 | 136 | 325 | 100 |
| 53 | N. Snd. Seawolves | *7 | 946 | 135 | 130 | 280 | 50 |
| 54 | West Virginia Chaos | 8 | 1,072 | 134 | 107 | 310 | 20 |
| 55 | Hamilton Rage | **6 | 795 | 133 | 110 | 200 | 75 |
| 56 | Nashville Metros | 8 | 1,051 | 131 | 118 | 227 | 83 |
| 57 | Chicago Inferno | @3 | 385 | 128 | 107 | 174 | 104 |
| 58 | LA Misioneros | *7 | 894 | 128 | 120 | 184 | 100 |
| 59 | OC Blue Star | 8 | 970 | 121 | 133 | 157 | 75 |
| 60 | Pali Blues | **6 | 686 | 114 | 100 | 192 | 71 |
| 61 | Springfield Demize | 8 | 878 | 110 | 98 | 245 | 40 |
| 62 | Vancouver Whitecaps | 8 | 862 | 108 | 77 | 203 | 77 |
| 63 | Toronto Lynx | 8 | 850 | 106 | 100 | 200 | 25 |
| 64 | Washington Crossfire | 8 | 819 | 102 | 85 | 250 | 50 |
| 65 | Westchester Flames | 8 | 794 | 99 | 95 | 95 | 140 |
| 66 | Bradenton | **7 | 665 | 95 | 75 | 150 | 50 |
| 67 | Texas Dutch Lions | %4 | 360 | 90 | 90 | 150 | 30 |
| 68 | Brooklyn Knights | 8 | 642 | 80 | 86 | 103 | 42 |
| 69 | Fraser Vall.Mariners | 8 | 605 | 76 | 75 | 85 | 65 |
| 70 | New Jersey Rangers | **6 | 414 | 69 | 66 | 115 | 44 |
| 71 | Chicago Fire | **6 | 410 | 68 | 45 | 200 | 0 |
| 72 | Bermuda Hogges | 8 | 473 | 59 | 45 | 108 | 20 |
| 73 | Real Maryland | !0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| PDL TOTAL | 520 | 251,154 | 483 | 250 | 8,174 | 0 |
* Missing 1 game
**Missing 2 games
# Missing 3 games
% Missing 4 games
@ Missing 5 games
& Missing 6 games
! Missing 8 games
NOTES:
- It’s based on incomplete information, obviously, but the league average dropped slightly from last year, when it was 542. These are all small sample sizes (and incomplete ones in some cases), so it’s hard to pinpoint the reasons, but the expansion teams collectively averaged just over 400 a game (led by Austin’s 1,395), while more than half the returning teams saw a decrease from 2011, from 6% for the Michigan Bucks to 58% for the El Paso Patriots).
- Portland was the big success story, growing its average by 88%, helped by a pair of league-record 8k+ crowds. The teams that had bigger percentage increases went from minuscule crowds to (mostly) small crowds.
- Des Moines led the league (again) for the 10th time in 13 years, and they were second the other three times. Fresno, which has routinely been among the leaders, was again, but dropped by a third (in the five games I have figures for). Fresno’s tickets are all free through a local media sponsorship.
- Austin’s return to the field (after the original Aztex moved to Orlando) was a success, with a fifth-place standing.
- A fairly standard eight clubs averaged more than 1,000 a game (last year it was nine), but there were 31 who averaged fewer than 200 and eight who were under 100 (not including Real Maryland, who didn’t announce any figures all year).
July 21st, 2012 at 9:58 am
Not that it makes a difference in where the Aztex finished on this table, but the first game had a serious undercount due to inexperienced volunteers. Who knows what the more realistic number was, but at a minimum it matched their season closer. Just figured I’d throw that in there:)
As far as I’m concerned, the next target is topping the Lone Stars peak of 1650 or so.
July 21st, 2012 at 10:12 am
Well, they certainly did themselves proud, and if they really are serious about a jump to the pro level, at least there is one team out this way now (and perhaps two).
July 23rd, 2012 at 12:59 pm
Yes, they did. “This way” meaning ‘Out West’. Which really isn’t much of a help. They’re still too far away for a bus ride. If the Aztex did decide to go pro, they’d be flying everywhere. I’d feel more comfortable about going pro if they were drawing over 2k.
July 23rd, 2012 at 1:16 pm
I’m always one to believe that you should move up later rather than sooner.
July 23rd, 2012 at 3:49 pm
Hey Kenn – I’ve been keeping attendance numbers for the PDL this season too – and discovered your blog after doing that – I noticed some discrepencies I thought I’d point out.
Austin Aztex – same # matches but I have 1,505 808 946 1,083 1,357 1,162 1,308 1,986 for a total of 10,155
(does yours account for the difference reported by Eric?)
I’m missing a FC Tucson matches (6 reported vs 7 for you) but when I checked pdl.uslsoccer.com – I still see no reported numbers for the games vs Orange County 6/23 and BYU 7/6)
I also have differences on about 12 other teams – most look like you were able to get attendance from an extra match I don’t have.
Contact me if you want to compare numbers in detail.
July 23rd, 2012 at 4:11 pm
Thanks, Jim.
I have 2,507 – 808 – 946 – 1,083 – 1,357 – 1,162 – 1,308 – 1,986 for Austin. So our difference appears to be in the home opener, which would be an outlier, obviously. It appears they revised it downward to 1,505 after I originally entered the number. I’ll make that change, thanks.
Tucson was 513 on 7/6. Sometimes you have to check the local newspaper report or the team Twitter feeds.
July 23rd, 2012 at 5:59 pm
This is an interesting table and premise of the relative strength of soccer as a spectator activity in different markets.
To expand on this though, from a business perspective, it means nothing until there is someone who is willing to put their money on the table. ie a table showing the attendance and an estimate of gate receipts would be infinitly more enlightening. Even if they were just average ticket price times attendance with the methodolgy explained or noted.
July 24th, 2012 at 8:17 am
Well, feel free. I don’t have any interest in tracking down the average ticket price posted by each of 73 PDL teams and giving you an estimate of how much ticket revenue each club brought in, given that such a chart would (surprise) likely show that Des Moines brings in a lot and Bradenton brings in zippo. And to what end? You know how you know your PDL team’s owners are okay with how it’s going? They’re still around.
You’re not going to find gate receipts in this country (unless it’s a publicly traded franchise or it comes out in discovery for a legal action), and a club’s posted average ticket price is probably not what their actual average ticket price is, given groups and other discounts.
But, by all means, knock yourself out.
July 25th, 2012 at 9:03 am
All Boston Victory need to do is move up to USL-Pro. That’s when the big bucks start rolling in.
July 25th, 2012 at 9:15 am
Well, they’ll be rolling. I am not sure which way.
July 26th, 2012 at 9:21 am
Regarding Austin’s home opener — I thought the Aztex had modified the attendance to 2505. Interesting that it’s 1505 at the league. That’s the difference that I was talking about. Not that it really matters. As I said, first game inexperience led to a miscount that can’t be recovered. The 2505 number was a ‘reasonable adjustment’ that probably had as much basis in reality as the 1505 number. It’s all good, and will be better from here out.:)
August 27th, 2012 at 2:43 pm
Kenn: is it your best guess that the top 5 attendance teams listed here might be at a financial break-even? do you think that overall PDL attendance fell since last year?
August 27th, 2012 at 9:50 pm
You know how you can guesstimate the chances that a given team is in a decent financial position?
If they’re still around.
Des Moines has been around for a long time. Fresno, too. Portland’s got an MLS team behind them that sells out every game. Carolina has been around forever, too. And Austin…well, I have no idea, other than that they have ambition.
And I said above that PDL attendance this year was lower than last year.
April 7th, 2013 at 10:02 pm
Thanks for the response-I suppose it’s much more complicated than I thought and your point about them staying on is right.
Missing Highlanders game was season opener against Seattle-> 1,253
http://www.timescolonist.com/sports/seattle-pressed-by-game-highlanders-1.11628
April 8th, 2013 at 10:37 am
Thank you for that data point. Much appreciated.